Discussions under General

Events that don't have enough data for the read side

first post: FabianSchmied wrote: When adapting the code to better match the current specs, I had one...

latest post: FabianSchmied wrote: Okay, thanks for the answer. I've to say, I don't really like the e...

Command granularity

first post: FabianSchmied wrote: With the requirements currently outlined for the Sponsorship applic...

latest post: JoergEg wrote: I think you cannot tell yet because we have to recheck the specs wi...

Coding guidelines

first post: FabianSchmied wrote: Here's an initial suggestion for coding guidelines: http://godfathe...

latest post: JoergEg wrote: Good to know.

Synchronous read model updates

first post: FabianSchmied wrote: In the Sponsorship application, we really need a synchronous update...

latest post: FabianSchmied wrote: Sorry, that was stupid - only the event handlers need to use the sa...

Naming: Specs vs. Code

first post: FabianSchmied wrote: Since Jörg checked in much of the code before the specs were w...

latest post: JoergEg wrote: The commands and events should have been just sample. Feel free to ...

Memento pattern/AggregateBase.GetSnapshot

first post: FabianSchmied wrote: I'm currently reviewing the code Jörg has checked in to get to...

latest post: JoergEg wrote: I would highly recommend to NOT use snapshots unless you really nee...

Optimistic concurrency control - will we need it?

first post: sburgstaller wrote: Our requirements say that we will have to support a maximum of 5 co...

latest post: FabianSchmied wrote: We should probably determine for every command: does the execution ...

Code Review 2011-11-19

first post: FabianSchmied wrote: I've reviewed the code currently in the repository (ccedb89d2b55, a...

latest post: FabianSchmied wrote: (Just put your opinions on that Wiki page, maybe including your use...

Questions concerning requirements

first post: saintedlama wrote: After reading the requirements/documentation some questions popped ...

latest post: martin_schmid wrote: @Fabian: The specs are very good atm. I'll meet Gabi at the weekend...

CQRS - yes or no?

first post: FabianSchmied wrote: In our meeting on Nov. 8, we mostly rejected the idea of using CQRS...

latest post: FabianSchmied wrote: :)